pierfishing.com :: FAQ :: search :: memberlist :: album
  Sign-up as new user :: log in



Sign-up as new user | I forgot my password

PFIC Message Boards >> Off-Topic Reply to this topic
>> re: Endangered Species Act, for UPSAC's consideration [topic: previous/next]
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 12:39 am
bigfoot


Posts: 20

My contact at the Center for Biological Diversity, Brent Plater, forwarded this on to me. I'd like to get UPSAC behind it. Here's the letter in it's entirety.

Yea or nay? If yea, I'll tell them to put UPSAC on board.

Quote:
Dear Colleague:


The following is about an Endangered Species Act CALIFORNIA FISHING ORGANIZATION SIGN-ON LETTER, to be sent to California Senators Feinstein and Boxer. PLEASE CONSIDER SIGNING THIS LETTER ASAP. THANK YOU for reading this!!!


Hello! Troubling Endangered Species Act legislation is being discussed in Congress that would weaken habitat protections for endangered species, undermine science-based decision making in the law, and make other significant changes in the Endangered Species Act.

The following is a LETTER FOR SIGNATURES BY LEADERS IN THE CALIFORNIA FISHING COMMUNITY. It is a group sign-on letter on which we hope to have many signatures. We have just started circulating this letter. Some of its initial signatories are included below.

HOW TO SIGN: You can sign by replying to Dr. C. Mark Rockwell, D.C. (see below). All signatures are typed signature blocks. Please tell us how you wish your signature block to appear. Typical signature information includes name and title, institution, and city.

For more information, you may wish to access the following web site: http://www.stopextinction.org/ (both “Please sign the scientist letter to Senators Boxer and Feinstein” and “ESC Activist Update” includes information about recent legislative action and some of the previous scientist statements).

HELP GET THE WORD OUT. Also, if you have any colleagues who may be interested in this letter, please forward it to them. Thanks!

THANK YOU. Please let us know if you have questions or if there is any way we can be helpful to you.


Dr. C. Mark Rockwell, on behalf of the Northern Calif. Council, Federation of Fly Fishers, and the Endangered Species Coalition, 530 432-9198, summerhillfarmpv@aol.com.

February 16, 2006





CALIFORNIA FISHING ORGAINZATION SIGN-ON LETTER FOR YOUR POSSIBLE SIGNATURE:

The Honorable Dianne Feinstein
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510

The Honorable Barbara Boxer
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senators Feinstein and Boxer:

On behalf of the tens of thousands of members we represent in both recreational and commercial fishing, we would like to express our strong support for the Endangered Species Act. As a consortium of California Fishing organizations, we are concerned about the current attempt to change the Endangered Species Act because these changes will reduce the protections necessary to safeguard California’s fisheries.

California has a long history of containing some of the most prolific fisheries in the Western United Sates. At one time, our salmon fishery was second only to that on the Columbia River, and the commercial salmon canning industry began on the Sacramento River. Recreational and commercial fishing has been an integral part of the fabric of California for over 150 years. Today, most of California’s fisheries are weakened, and require the protection of not only state and federal regulation, but protections under the Endangered Species Act. Both protection of the individual species and protections of the habitats that support them have been necessary. Sacramento winter run Chinook salmon, Central Valley Steelhead, Sacramento Valley Spring run Chinook Salmon, California Silver (Coho) salmon and Delta Smelt are some of the fresh and saltwater fish protected by the designation of Critical Habitat under the Endangered Species Act.

We must continue to protect the habitat of endangered fish, plants and wildlife and we must hold true to the Act’s principle of recovery as the ultimate goal. One of the most effective ways to protect species is to protect the places where they live. The Endangered Species Act protects the critical habitat that is needed to prevent the extinction of endangered species. The Act requires the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to use the most rigorous science available when developing common sense solutions to protect America’s threatened and endangered wildlife.

The Endangered Species Act stands for fundamental principles that we all believe in and cannot allow to be weakened or removed. Eight-six percent of American voters support the Endangered Species Act. Fully 95% of voters agree that one of the most effective ways to protect species is to protect the places they live. We owe it to our children and grandchildren to be good stewards of the environment and leave behind a legacy of protecting endangered species and the special places they call home.

The Endangered Species Act is now under threat from special interests, and the politicians they give money to. The House of Representatives has passed a bill, HR 3824 (Rep. Pombo), that would significantly weaken protections for endangered fish and their habitats. If this bill, or some version of it, becomes law, it would eliminate habitat protections, abandon the commitment to recovering species, repeal protections against hazardous pesticides, and politicize the scientific decision-making process. In addition, it would set up an unprecedented entitlement program that would require the federal government to use taxpayer dollars to pay developers for complying with the Act’s prohibition against killing or injuring endangered species.

Senator, we are asking you to support the Endangered Species Act, and oppose any bill that would weaken protections for endangered species and habitat. Our California fresh and saltwater fisheries depend on it. Thank you for your work to protect our nation’s environment and natural resources. We look forward to working with you to protect endangered species.

Sincerely,


Please e-mail the following to: summerhillfarmpv@aol.com
Name:
Title:
Affiliation:

Questions: Call Dr. C. Mark Rockwell at 530 432-9198, e-mail: summerhillfarmpv@aol.com
Top of page
Send private message Make a quoted reply on this post
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:05 pm
blahblahblah


Posts: 22

FYI, the Delta smelt is being recommended for emergency listing with the ESA. See following press release:

CONSERVATION GROUPS REQUEST ENDANGERED STATUS

FOR DISAPPEARING DELTA SMELT

Emergency Petition for Change in Federal Listing as Smelt Population Collapses



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 8, 2006



Contact: Jeff Miller, Center for Biological Diversity (510) 499-9185

Tina Swanson, The Bay Institute (415) 272-4501

Kate Poole, Natural Resources Defense Council (415) 875-6100



San Francisco, Calif. – The Center for Biological Diversity, the Bay Institute, and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) today submitted a 42-page petition to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) requesting emergency listing of the delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).



The delta smelt is a small, nearly translucent fish found only in the upper San Francisco Bay and Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. It was once one of the most common and abundant of the Delta’s open water fishes, but in the 1980s its population declined by more than 80 percent. The species was listed as threatened under the ESA in 1993. In recent years the delta smelt population has collapsed again: in 2005, the second consecutive year of record low numbers, its abundance was only 2.4 percent of that measured in 1993.



Delta smelt spend their entire lives in the Delta, the west coast’s largest estuary, swimming in shallow open waters at the interface of inflowing fresh water from the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and salt water from the ocean. In 1993 USFWS identified multiple threats to the species, including export of fresh water from the Delta, loss of habitat, impaired water quality from pesticides and other pollutants, and competition and predation from introduced species.



Just two years ago, when USFWS completed a status review of the species, the agency concluded that most of these threats remained, and in some cases had worsened. New analyses since then show that recent record-high Delta water exports are related to the delta smelt population decline. Recently published population viability analyses indicate that the species has a 50 percent probability of going extinct in the next 20 years. However, despite this new information and the current record-low population numbers, neither USFWS nor other agencies charged with protecting the smelt and its habitat have taken major actions to reverse the decline.



“The science is clear and compelling. Delta smelt, one of the best indicators of environmental conditions in the estuary, is in critical condition and for the most part we know the reasons why,” said Dr. Tina Swanson, Senior Scientist for the Bay Institute. “It’s time for the state and federal resource agencies to apply this information to protect this species and its habitat – before it’s too late.”



The delta smelt is not the only fish species at risk of extinction in the Delta. Since 2002 scientists have also documented catastrophic declines of longfin smelt, threadfin shad and striped bass, and numbers of white and green sturgeon in the Bay and Sacramento River have fallen to alarmingly low levels. The declines are thought to be due to the combined effects of Delta water management and exports, pollution from toxic chemicals and impacts of introduced species on the Delta’s planktonic food web, the same factors identified by USFWS as threats to the smelt.



“Delta smelt are on a rapid trajectory toward extinction and clearly need increased federal protections,” said Jeff Miller of the Center for Biological Diversity. “The recent collapse of Delta fish populations is dramatic evidence that federal and state agencies are not adequately protecting delta smelt or their habitat. Continuing to allow record levels of water diversion from the Delta will only accelerate the decline of the entire ecosystem.”



The Delta, an essential part of the delta smelt’s habitat, is a major hub for California’s water system. The State Water Project, federal Central Valley Project and thousands of private water diversions take as much as 65 percent of the Delta’s total freshwater inflow, killing both spawning adult delta smelt and their young in pumps and diversions. At times, pumping levels are so high they reverse flow in the San Joaquin River, confusing and delaying adult fish migrating upstream, impairing downstream transport of larval and juvenile delta smelt from the upper estuary to their brackish water rearing habitat, and drawing water and fish into the pumps. Hydraulic models indicate that when water export rates are high, virtually all young smelt in the southern Delta are sucked into the pumps. The recent decline of Delta fish species coincides with significant increases in water exports by the state and federal water projects (seasonal exports in the 2000s are up to 48 percent higher than in the early 1990s) and higher mortality of smelt at the pumps. The four highest years of water exports from the Delta have occurred since 2000.



“The delta smelt is a canary in the coal mine, and its plummeting numbers show that the Delta is on the verge of collapse,” said Kate Poole, senior attorney with NRDC. “Urgent action is needed to protect Delta habitat and water quality, for the benefit of the smelt and the 20 million Californians who depend on the Delta for clean drinking water.”



Despite crashing Delta fish populations, state and federal agencies are in the process of approving increased water diversion and storage projects that will exacerbate current conditions for delta smelt, likely increase mortality of smelt and further alter their habitat. The proposed “South Delta Improvements Program” will increase Delta water exports and install permanent tidal barriers, modifying Delta flow patterns and degrading smelt habitat. The CALFED Bay-Delta Program, promoted as a solution to reducing the negative impacts of the federal and state water projects on fish and wildlife, has proven ineffective and now has largely collapsed.



In September 2005, just before scientists announced that Delta fisheries were declining precipitously, Rep. Dick Pombo (R-CA), Chairman of the House Resources Committee, passed H.R. 3824, a bill that would gut the Endangered Species Act by systematically removing every proven recovery tool for imperiled species – including a provision to eliminate protected “critical habitat.” Pombo’s bill would make it more difficult to recover and restore the Delta ecosystem and its fisheries.



More information regarding the delta smelt is available on the Center for Biological Diversity’s Web site at: http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/swcbd/species/deltasmelt.html
Top of page
Send private message Make a quoted reply on this post
PFIC Message Boards >> Off-Topic Reply to this topic
Page 1 of 1  
Display posts from previous:   
Jump to: