pierfishing.com :: FAQ :: search :: memberlist :: album
  Sign-up as new user :: log in



Sign-up as new user | I forgot my password

PFIC Message Boards >> Fishery Conservation, Management and Politics Reply to this topic
>> Delta and Fishing Activists Disrupt Secret Delta Meetings [topic: previous/next]
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:00 pm
Ken Jones


Posts: 9447
Location: California

September 30, 2010
Delta and Fishing Activists Disrupt Secret Delta Meetings

For Immediate Release -- September 30, 2010

A Thursday morning meeting of Bay Delta Conservation Plan principals was disrupted by a fisherman, two environmentalists, and a Delta farmer protesting the closed process.

The Department of Water Resources has told legislators that they're not welcome at meetings of signatories to the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, the plan that state water exporters have undertaken to secure their water supplies.

The meetings have been going forward behind closed doors since August in what Resources Secretary Lester Snow told lawmakers was "a key procedural component of the public BDCP Steering Committee process."

Showing up this morning at the meeting convened at the California Farm Bureau Federation in Sacramento were Dan Bacher, fisheries activist, researcher, and editor of The Fish Sniffer; Bill Jennings, Executive Director of the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (CSPA); Jim Crenshaw, President/Treasurer of CSPA; and Brett Baker, sixth generation pear farmer from Sutter Island in the Northern Delta.

Speaking seats at the meeting had been reserved for "principals," representatives of the entities who have financed the planning process. Bacher, Jennings, Crenshaw, and Baker were asked not to report the names of any of the participants or attribute quotes to them. They refused.

When asked to leave, the four asked whether they would be arrested if they refused. In response, Secretary Snow disbanded the meeting.

In an interview last week, Jonas Minton of the Planning and Conservation League told the Central Valley Business Times that exporters had withdrawn from the public BDCP process when confronted with overwhelming scientific evidence that exports from the Bay-Delta would have to be reduced to save the Estuary.

Said Minton, "They've been frantically trying to come up with some kind of agreement that could be signed before this Governor leaves office."

A similar push by the Governor has driven the Marine Life Protection Act process going forward in coastal Northern California.

The MLPA process, like the BDCP process, has been characterized by attempts to bypass open meeting laws. In that case, MLPA officials have limited media coverage of their "work sessions," which they distinguish from public meetings. At least one independent journalist was arrested for trying to film "work session" proceedings.

Newspaper industry and civil liberties attorneys say the process violated the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act and the 1st Amendment.

The Delta and fishing activists involved are available for interviews.

_________________
Support UPSAC! Preserve pier and shore angling in California.
Top of page
Send private message Make a quoted reply on this post
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:43 am
illcatchanything2


Posts: 4519

This whole thing stinks..... IMHO, Arnie has done very little for our state and now that he is a "lame duck" he is looking for something, anything, that he can call a legacy. Secret meetings that are disbanded when a few people with different viewpoints show up, an MLPA process that is funded (by far and large) by known anti fishing groups to get it passed, but with no funding for enforcement.....Whats next? We can only hope that come November, no matter if we get Mr. Moonbeam or Ms. E-Bay, they will see the light and realize that our beautiful state is in a financial crises and redirect the priorities. Hopefully the winner (BTW- I am not a big fan of either one), will repeal the MLPA's that have already been put into effect, stop further work on the other MLPA's and stop draining the Delta until sound and objective science, not science that has been bought and paid for by either side, can come up with a better plan that takes into consideration all of the people of the state, not just those who would like to see a complete ban on angling or those that would drain a beautiful and vital resource so that swimming pools can be filled. I am not going to hold my breath for this, but one can always hope...... (exit's soapbox now)........
_________________
Fish like this is your last day on earth, conserve like you will live 1000 years.
Top of page
Send private message Make a quoted reply on this post
PFIC Message Boards >> Fishery Conservation, Management and Politics Reply to this topic
Page 1 of 1  
Display posts from previous:   
Jump to: