pierfishing.com :: FAQ :: search :: memberlist :: album
  Sign-up as new user :: log in



Sign-up as new user | I forgot my password

PFIC Message Boards >> Off-Topic Reply to this topic
>> California fishing license [topic: previous/next]
PostPosted: Sat Jun 03, 2017 8:11 pm
Ken Jones


Posts: 9461
Location: California

California State Senate Unanimously Passes Fishing License Reform Bill

Last night, the California State Senate unanimously passed Senate Bill 187, authored by Senator Tom Berryhill, state legislation that will transition California’s calendar-based fishing license to one that is valid a full 12-months from the date of purchase. This is great news, for in 2015 similar legislation failed to reach the Senate floor.

“This bill would not only improve access to recreational fishing, it will protect California jobs dependent on outdoor tourism,” said Senator Tom Berryhill, author of SB 187. “Labor unions, state and local chambers of commerce, anglers, tourism groups and everyday Californians recognize that California’s antiquated fishing licensing program has proven to be a barrier to participation.”

Based on the success of other states, the bill sponsored by the California Sportfishing League (CSL) aims to address California’s costly and failing fishing license program by increasing fishing participation rates and license sales.

California’s costly and antiquated fishing license program is a contributing factor to an alarming decline in fishing participation rates. As fishing license sales face a death spiral, fishing’s economic contribution will continue to decline, as will revenue for state conservation and fishery programs.

The legislation is also supported by an impressive coalition of state and local organizations representing small business, labor, local government, travel, hospitality, marinas and boat manufacturers. The coalition recognizes that an unprecedented decline in fishing license sales threatens recreational fishing’s $4.6 billion annual economic contribution to California communities dependent on outdoor tourism, jobs and tax revenue.

Even the International Union of Operating Engineers and SEIU Local 1000, who represent the rank and file Department of Fish and Wildlife employees, agree that a 12-month fishing license will sell more licenses and bring in more revenue – not less revenue – to the DFW.

We owe a special thanks to everyone who called or emailed their State Senator -- but we still have a ways to go. Before reaching the Governor’s desk, SB 187 must pass the State Assembly. Your continued support is greatly appreciated.

Fishing License Facts:

• Despite all its natural resources and size, California’s fishing participation rate has declined to dead last (per capita) in the United States. Furthermore, according to a 2015 study conducted by the CSL, California’s annual fishing license is the costliest in the United States (w/permits). When compared to other states, California’s annual license is 76% more expensive.

• Sales of the state’s annual fishing licenses have declined over 55% since 1980, during which time California’s population increased over 60%.

• Another contributing factor to declining sales is that the state’s annual license is not valid a full 12-months from the date of purchase, like the state’s annual park pass. Calendar-based fishing licenses expire on December 31st of every year, providing little to no incentive for anglers to purchase a license late in the year. Today, 11 states and Mexico offer a 12-month fishing license.

• The State of Texas implemented a 12-month license program in 2005, and over the past five years (2012-16), they experienced an 11.8% increase in sales and a 12.58% increase in revenue (or $1.9 million). Maryland experienced similar success.

• Fishery and conservation programs are also at risk as fishing license sales fuel the Fish and Game Preservation Fund, which is facing an unprecedented $20 million deficit. This deficit will only grow as federal funding, assessed by the number of licenses sold, is reduced as annual license sales continue to decline.

Thanks to Hashem for sending me this.

_________________
Support UPSAC! Preserve pier and shore angling in California.
Top of page
Send private message Make a quoted reply on this post
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 11:52 am
Fishmom1


Posts: 180
Location: Benicia, CA

If you care about this issue, contacts with your Assemblyperson are in order! Contact information can be found at:
http://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov/

_________________
Pick up a bag of trash--every time!
Top of page
Send private message Make a quoted reply on this post
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 1:08 pm
Ken Jones


Posts: 9461
Location: California

Last I heard it would not start until 2020. Not sure why it would take so long.
_________________
Support UPSAC! Preserve pier and shore angling in California.
Top of page
Send private message Make a quoted reply on this post
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 2:27 pm
GammaRei


Posts: 96

Finally. I have been wondering why California did not do this years ago. I have some friends who mistakenly went and purchased yearlong fishing licenses in October only to be surprised that their license expired on Jan 1st. I am also curious why it will take so long to implement this.

- G

_________________
http://www.BumpFire.net

bass_turd77 wrote:
I think he went at night, like when the sun is down. It tends to be dark then.
Top of page
Send private message Visit poster's website Make a quoted reply on this post
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 4:29 pm
Mahigeer


Posts: 6373

"We owe a special thanks to everyone who called or emailed their State Senator -- but we still have a ways to go. Before reaching the Governor’s desk, SB 187 must pass the State Assembly. Your continued support is greatly appreciated."

Top of page
Send private message Make a quoted reply on this post
PFIC Message Boards >> Off-Topic Reply to this topic
Page 1 of 1  
Display posts from previous:   
Jump to: